Feedback

London Futurists welcomes suggestions on other citations to include on this page!

Giulio Prisco – Science writer, technology expert, futurist, cosmist, transhumanist:

London is expensive like hell and the weather is horrible. The subway is too crowded and they don’t let you smoke in pubs. But I would like to live in London just to attend London Futurists every week.

Diogo Neves, Cambridge:

If you care about the future YOU MUST join this group! 🙂

Roland Schiefer – PhD in medicine, technical translator, author of the book “All in the mind”:

Excellent presentations, interesting discussions, stimulating chats in pubs.

Gabriel Dayan – technologist and futurist

If you are a futurist, in other words someone with the vision to extrapolate social and technological trends, this is a great place to network and develop spontaneous think tanks. If you are an investor with a lot of patience, consider this a fishing expedition. It is only a matter of time before someone shares a concept with a viable and powerful business model.

Amon Kalkin – Founder, Zero State and Wave

The group is going from strength to strength. Excellent speakers, venue, attendance, and quality of questions.

Acknowledgements

Many thanks are due to Uri Gonda of Onomazo for providing the logo, the PowerPoint template, and the design themes, used in the creation of the videos on this website.

The quotation “Civilisation’s path from yesterday to tomorrow passes through London” is by Brian Hall.

2 Responses to Feedback

  1. Theresa says:

    I am not particularly familiar with London Futurists but want to check that the awareness is there that there is no scientific consensus on GMO Safety. This is important and there is a world of information out there about food sovereignty and small farmers. Cancer……again I want to check that the awareness is there within the group regarding joined up thinking…I’m afraid listening to the Globalnet21 webinar, David Wood, I don’t think the awareness is there :-(.
    I am somewhat disappointed.
    It is essential emerging and converging technologies are regulated correctly, I do not believe this is going to happen unless there is a change in the system and without more joined up thinking.
    Joined up thinking……http://markcurtis.info/2017/05/24/the-british-establishment-is-putting-our-lives-at-risk-our-states-key-ally-is-a-major-public-threat/
    I want to say a big thank you to David Wood for the webinar, but with respect he appears to be badly informed regarding the GM debate and way too trusting.
    What else could there be that London Futurists are not aware of? I am concerned.
    More information here:
    http://www.gmwatch.org/en/news/latest-news/17639-did-former-us-epa-man-influence-efsa-verdict-on-glyphosate
    https://amp.theguardian.com/environment/2017/may/24/eu-declared-monsanto-weedkiller-safe-after-intervention-from-controversial-us-official
    https://www.thenhf.com/codex/our-work-at-codex/4587-crashing-monsanto-s-pesticide-party-in-beijing
    https://www.foodandwatereurope.org/pressreleases/biotech-ambassadors-diplomacy-or-marketing-3/
    A key point is this, in my humble opinion:
    There is not a level playing field for scientific debate and too many people, like David Wood, are not thinking to question what establishment science is telling them….anyway just forming an impression from the webinar which I did not watch to the end.
    Level playing field debate and communication amongst scientists from different fields needs to be improved.
    ********* and ******** should be contacted regarding Genetic Engineering and much more,
    What is great about the webinar is that David Wood comes across that he is open to discussion so maybe there is some hope……the right of peoples to define their own food and agriculture systems and hopefully their own futures.

    “Scientists study only those aspects of the universe that it is within their gift to study: what is observable; what is measurable and amenable to statistical analysis; and, indeed, what they can afford to study within the means and time available. Science thus emerges as a giant tautology, a “closed system”. It can present us with robust answers only because its practitioners take very great care to tailor the questions.” Colin Tudge

    • David Wood says:

      Hi Theresa, It’s interesting – and telling – that you assume that, because I reached a different conclusion from you about the potential merits of GMO, that I must be unaware of the material you have seen. I’ll simply say that I’ve done a great deal of reading on GMO and stand by my position. Be assured that, with my training in the philosophy of science, and with my background as a supporter of many other positions that do *not* (yet) have the support of mainstream scientists, I am aware that lots of pressures distort this debate, on both sides.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s